A large problem that many people face today is
not necessarily getting water, but finding clean water. Over 1 billion people
live without clean drinking water because of things like pollution from
developing countries. Sometime in mid-January a large amount of cadmium was accidentally
spilled into Longjiang River in China. Officials have stated the the amount of
cadmium now in the water is at 5 times the legal limit. This poses a serious
health issue because cadmium is a known carcinogen. The source of the spill has
been traced to a mining company that refines zinc ore. Cadmium is one of the
toxic byproducts of smelting zinc. Over 3.2 million people in south China are now
using bottled water for their source of freshwater while the government
attempts to clean the spill. Having limited access to fresh drinking water is a
huge problem that is only magnified through pollution from industries. When
people cannot find clean drinking water, they will resort to using contaminated
water just to stay alive. The problem with this is the number of waterborne diseases
that can be contracted through drinking bad water. According to the WHO waterborne
illness is the world’s number one killer.
Read more about the cadmium spill here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/china-cadmium-spill-threatens-city-water-supplies-rare-earths-mining-suspected-cause/2012/01/30/gIQAmb2hbQ_story.html
Monday, January 30, 2012
Thursday, January 26, 2012
The New River: The most polluted river in the United States
After doing a quick search for videos
relating to water pollution, I found what I consider to be the most disgusting
looking river I have ever seen. I was even more amazed that the river runs
through part of the United States. The New River is widely considered the most
polluted river within the United States. The river is so contaminated that when
a technician draws water for testing, he or she wears two pairs of gloves. Most
of the pollution comes from Mexican manufacturing plants and untreated sewage
that is dumped into the river. The river is filled with dangerous toxins that
can cause tuberculosis, typhus, encephalitis, and other potentially fatal
diseases. What makes this even more disturbing is that many illegal immigrants
use the river to get past the border patrol, because patrols will not enter the
water. To make matters worse the exposed immigrants will often get jobs in the
food industry. Combine this with the fact that many do not seek proper medical
help when they are ill, and you have the recipe for disaster. This river is a
breeding ground for terrible new strains of disease that could devastate the
human population. It is startling that only in 2005 did the government
intervene and begin building a water treatment plant to help clean the water.
Find more information at: http://www.calexiconewriver.com/history/
Find more information at: http://www.calexiconewriver.com/history/
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Friday, January 20, 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Google Alerts,Twitter, and Sustainability
Never
in a million years would I have pictured myself creating a twitter account. I
used to laugh at all my friends that had them. However, after sucking it up and
creating one, I can see how following certain groups could be very informing. Google
Alerts is proving to be even more useful. I have always had a strong interest
in pathology, and being able to simply log in and have all the latest news on
the subject is great. On twitter, I
chose to follow NCSU Sustainability. They provide many ways we can help make
our environment sustainable. A recent tweet provided the instructions on how to
weatherize your dorm to save electricity.
After reading about sustainability I have learned a few things. What I believe to be one of the more important issues is the loss of biodiversity. Our current lifestyle is having a huge impact on the world’s ecosystems, 15 ecosystems are currently in rapid decline, while only 4 have improved. Another problem that I have read about is the rapid switch to industrialization, and how it destroys farmland. With technology becoming more and more prevalent we have a shrinking amount of available farmland. Most countries import 90% of the food they eat, and export little food themselves. This is a trend that has to stop if we wish to sustain ourselves on this earth.
After reading about sustainability I have learned a few things. What I believe to be one of the more important issues is the loss of biodiversity. Our current lifestyle is having a huge impact on the world’s ecosystems, 15 ecosystems are currently in rapid decline, while only 4 have improved. Another problem that I have read about is the rapid switch to industrialization, and how it destroys farmland. With technology becoming more and more prevalent we have a shrinking amount of available farmland. Most countries import 90% of the food they eat, and export little food themselves. This is a trend that has to stop if we wish to sustain ourselves on this earth.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Overpopulation and Food Sustainability
A
growing source of concern for our current population is food availability. Most
countries today rely heavily on importing foods, and very few countries export
food. The growing number of importers and the shrinking number of those able to
export threatens the sustainability of our lifestyle. Today, world hunger is at
the highest level it has ever been. Over 1 billion people go hungry every day,
and remain undernourished. A major cause of this is the rapid industrialization
of a heavily populated country. As a population begins to industrialize more
land that was once used for agriculture becomes allocated to creating buildings
and roads. This means that the country must import an increasingly large amount
of food to compensate.
If
we were to live in “island civilizations” the area for industrialization would
be much smaller, and so would the number of mouths to feed. A smaller amount of people would be much less
draining on the environment, making the population much more sustainable.
Reduced industrialization also means fewer roads and buildings need to be
built, and as a result the environment is not destroyed.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Summary and Respone to "Island Civilization" by Roderick Frazier Nash
In the essay Island
Civilization: A Vision for Human Occupancy of Earth, Robert Frazier Nash proposes his plan for the
distant fourth millennium. He begins his essay with powerful words on the
destructive behavior of humans, stating that since the very beginning humans
viewed the wilderness as something that must be controlled. To support his
argument, Nash points out that in the Bible the “wilderness” was land cursed by
God, and humans were banished there as punishment. He then continues to point
out how mankind built fences and roads to contain the wild, and that it was
only when the United States Census claimed that there was no longer a frontier
left that humans discovered the damage they had caused. Following this
revelation the human population sought to right their wrongs in different ways.
The government provided relief through the passage of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act in 1972 and that of the Endangered Species Act in
1973. Various authors that supported environmentalism wrote books on things
like restricting one’s own freedom for the good of the environment.
After completing his description of how mankind
destroyed the wilderness and their scramble to rectify the problem, Nash goes
on to explain the 3 possible outcomes for mankind. The first outcome is
referred to as the wasteland scenario. In this future the world has exhausted
all of its resources and become a desolate wasteland that can support very
little life. The garden scenario is the second possible outcome and under it
humans will have created technology capable of controlling nature, at the cost
of diversity. The final outcome is future primitive. This seems to be a
variation of the future Nash would like to see. In this scenario humans would
revert back to hunter gatherers and shun technology, allowing the Earth to
gradually return to its previous state.
The final pages of Nash’s paper explain his idea for
the future. His plan is to restrict the human population to 1.5 billion, and to
make self-sustaining “islands” of civilization. These civilizations would be
clusters of the population, and quite similar to cities. His plan also relies
on advanced technology that would not harm the Earth and that the “islands”
remain isolated from each other. All food production, manufacturing,
sanitation, and other services would take place directly within the
civilization.
I personally believe that Nash’s plan for an island
utopia sounds wonderful, but is not even close to being realistic. My first
major problem with his plan is the reduction of the population. He proposes
cutting the current population to 1.5 billion. In order for something like this
to happen only a fourth of the current population would be allowed to reproduce
one time. Most people want a family, and a family includes children. If you start
denying three fourths of the world the right to have a child, you’re going to
have a major problem. Any attempt to limit the world wide population through
regulations will undoubtedly end in violence and destruction. Thankfully
regulation on such a large scale would be impossible.
Another problem I have with this utopia stems from
the reduced population. One of the results of a population that has been
limited over a short time is a smaller gene pool. People would begin to look
very similar, and soon diversity would be almost nonexistent amongst humans. In
addition to this reduction in diversity, a small gene pool also leaves the
human population very vulnerable. Any sort of viral epidemic could wipeout the
human race, simply because immunity would be unlikely. If you don’t believe an
epidemic is capable of killing so many, just take a look at our history. Scientists
estimate that smallpox killed around 1 billion people, and there is still no
cure for the disease. The best scientists could do was create a vaccine. Another
epidemic that you are probably familiar with is the black plague, which killed at
least a third of the European population.
It is also suggested that a person would be able to
live in the “island” of their choosing. This can only result in conflict over
who would get to live where. You could base it on social status, but then you create
class warfare. Those that were less fortunate might attack another more
fortunate civilization. This would only lead to more destruction of the
environment.
In short, Nash’s dream world sounds amazing. It is
an island of peace and happiness. Who wouldn’t want to have all the resources
you need within a 100 mile radius? Unfortunately it is nothing more than an
unobtainable dream, and any attempt to make it a reality will result in more
chaos.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)